Donald Trump: 1, CNN: 0

No American president has been attacked by leftist American media outlets as much as Donald Trump. Not even George W. Bush was criticized as much.

The war against him started since it became clear that he was “the bulldozer” of the electoral race within the Republican Party and in the society after he was a material for mockery by liberals and leftist journalists and celebrities.

CNN is one of the media podiums, which took it upon itself to fight Trump and not just criticize him. The war between Trump, his administration and supporters and this channel is a severe war in which all weapons were used.

The majority of the American media, and the European media to some extent such as the BBC, the German DW and the French France 24, have a leftist orientation that’s naturally hostile to the right-wing and conservatives, mainly to President Trump.

The media is a very strong tool that masters “stereotyping” characters, monopolizing the interpretation of events and “morally” assassinating figures via comments, caricatures and comedy shows.

Trump however is strong-willed and he decided not to submit to the media’s bullying because he understands the agenda which dictates their moves. He also knows that Barack Obama was the American president whom the American media was the nicest and kindest to.

The problem is not in the political affiliation and whether one is a leftist, a centrist or a supporter of the right-wing. The problem is when a journalist is dragged under the enthusiasm of this affiliation and when he forgets professional standards

Mashari Althayidi

Trap for Trump?

Few days ago, CNN fell in a trap that it had dug for Trump. It announced dismissing – it said it accepted the resignation – of three of its most prominent journalists due to a fake report on Trump and Russia. One of those dismissed is Eric Lichtblau, an editor of the channel’s investigative unit. Lichtblau had been awarded the renowned Pulitzer prize for his work in the field of journalism.

In response, Trump tweeted: “Wow, CNN had to retract big story on ‘Russia,’ with 3 employees forced to resign. What about all the other phony stories they do? FAKE NEWS!” Before that, Trump and his son Donald Jr. blasted the famous channel by describing it as a “fake news network.”

The problem is not in the political affiliation and whether one is a leftist, a centrist or a supporter of the right-wing. These are related to freedom and interest. However, the problem is when a journalist is dragged under the enthusiasm of this affiliation and when he forgets professional standards.

For example, we all know that the Qatari Al Jazeera channel and other media outlets which are allied with it, such as those affiliated with the Brotherhood, the Khomeini’s ideology and leftists, promote the Qatari narrative about Qatar’s crisis. We all know that, for example, Al Arabiya and Sky News Arabia channels are against this media camp.

However, it is not right to step on the media profession while fighting these media battles. Political affiliations are not the problem as the “basic” problem is lying and falsifying. Whims make one blind and deaf. This is the summary of the story behind CNN’s retracted Russian report.

This article is also available in Arabic.
Saudi journalist Mashari Althaydi presents Al Arabiya News Channel’s “views on the news” daily show “Maraya.” He has previously held the position of a managing senior editor for Saudi Arabia & Gulf region at pan-Arab newspaper Asharq al-Awsat. Althaydi has published several papers on political Islam and social history of Saudi Arabia. He appears as a guest on several radio and television programs to discuss the ideologies of extremist groups and terrorists. He tweets under @MAlthaydy


Trump hating circuit courts get a rude awakening

The Ninth Circuit, later joined by the Fourth Circuit, decided (illegitimately) to put President Trump in his place, broadly rejecting his temporary suspension on travel from six Muslim-majority states – Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen – that had previously been designated by the Obama administration as terrorism risks.

In an example of “what goes around comes around,” the Supreme Court, in a per curiam – that is to say, unanimous – decision, gave the appellate courts their comeuppance, allowing President Trump’s travel bans to be in effect as “against foreign nationals abroad who have no connection to the United States at all.”

Never-Trump commentators would do well to reflect on the following statement in the per curiam ruling: “To prevent the Government from [suspending travel by] foreign nationals unconnected to the United States would appreciably injure its interests, without alleviating obvious hardship to anyone else.”  Clearly, the lower courts, in their zeal to injure the Trump presidency, gave no thought to whether a “foreign national” has a connection to the United States.  Excessive, unwarranted, and unfair allegations against President Trump were persuasive at the Ninth Circuit.

How will the media, which lauded the appellate decisions for their anti-Trump bias, respond to the following, which reflects the views of liberal as well as conservative members of the Court?  “Denying entry to such a foreign national does not burden any American party by reason of that party’s relationship with the foreign national[.] And the courts below did not conclude that exclusion in such circumstances would impose any legally relevant hardship on the foreign national himself.”

The ruling implies that the burden of the travel suspension “against a foreign national who lacks any connection to this country” will not be magnified into an Establishment Clause issue by claims of anti-Islam animus allegedly made in political campaign remarks.

The ruling also accepted the government’s request for writ of certiorari, and the issue will be set down for argument at the October 2017 term.  Pending a decision on the merits, the travel suspension does not affect “foreign nationals who have a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States. All other foreign nationals are subject to the [travel suspension].”

What next from the left: demands that the Supreme Court be impeached?

Hezbollah’s Mahdi Scouts and their road to martyrdom

Hezbollah al-Mahdi boy scouts shout slogans as they march at an anti-US protest in Beirut’s southern suburbs September 17, 2012. (Reuters)

As long as there are terror entities in the shape of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and its proxy Hezbollah, using the state system to brainwash youngsters into carrying out acts of terror in foreign lands, there will never be an end to terrorism.

As far as Hezbollah is concerned, it will never run out of cannon fodder, as thousands of child conscripts are being trained within its scouting groups, and are always waiting in the pipeline, ready to take up the challenge of becoming a suicide bomber or proxy warrior within the Shiite militia’s ever-diminishing ranks. The conflict in Syria has certainly taken a toll, as Hezbollah warriors die dutifully in droves for their Iranian paymasters.

Children as young as eight, who have joined the ranks of Hezbollah’s Imam al-Mahdi Scouts, are being brain-washed into learning the concepts of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s radical Shiite ideology, ready to be unleashed across the globe as part of Iran’s terror machine. As far as Hezbollah is concerned, they like to catch their conscripts at the earliest of age, and one of their favoured methods is to sign them up as Imam al-Mahdi Scouts, the youth wing of their fighting machine.

The whole point of this exercise is to program a child’s developing brain, through teaching it the concept of martyrdom, while influencing their hearts and minds, with the use of an intense program of brain washing. At summer camps, which are designed to accommodate children under the age of 10, and youths up to the age of 20, the scouts undergo military training, as well as taking part in various sporting activities.

Dehumanized through indoctrination

On a much darker side, while being dehumanized through indoctrination of radical Shiite ideology, the young novices are taught hatred of Israel, a loathing for Western culture, reverence to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, and at the same time, those attending these camps are expected to swear allegiance to Hassan Nasrallah, the current Secretary General of the Lebanese political and paramilitary party Hezbollah.

Whilst taking part in parades, which come as part of the scouting curriculum, the youngsters are often seen attired in military-style uniforms, they also wear berets, and at times, headbands emblazon their foreheads bearing slogans such as “Oh Jerusalem, we are coming”, while on other occasions, scouts have been seen to wear combat paint streaked on their faces, and carry plastic rifles.

The fleur-de-lis is the internationally recognized emblem of the scout movement, a badge containing this emblem is worn by the Imam al-Mahdi Scouts, and just like all other scout troops worldwide, their emblem contains an element of their own distinction, which in the case of the Hezbollah troop contains two swords either side of it, a hand raised as if taking an oath, and it also displays an inscription beneath it reading “Obey!”

As a fighting unit, Hezbollah is no more than a proxy wing of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). It’s function to carry out terror attacks, as well as fight in conflicts in foreign countries on behalf of the group.

With the IRGC Qods Force having moulded the Lebanese militia since its inception, having now found itself entangled in the Syrian Civil War, the IRGC finds it needs Hezbollah more than ever, and adding this to the war against ISIS that has broken out in Iraq, both military campaigns have drawn the Iranian regime ever deeper into a conflict that seems to have no end in sight.

Avoiding body count

To avoid a heavy body count, which would impact on public opinion back home, the Iranian regime has been using Hezbollah, and other foreign militias, to take on the heavy end of the fighting, in a bid to keep their own casualties to a minimum, which has left Hezbollah desperate for recruits.

Having suffered heavy losses on the battlefield over recent years, Hezbollah has been working hard to bring young recruits into its ranks, needing to create a new generation of operatives with which to replenish its battle-scarred units.

So, at a network of Imam al-Mahdi Scout camps, said to be set up in the Shiite districts of Beirut, the Beqaa Valley and South Lebanon, potential conscripts are put through rigorous military training, as well as heavy indoctrination, preparing them to take on the role of “resistance” fighters.

Hezbollah al-Mahdi scouts ride their motorcycle as they parade during an event for Jerusalem day or Al-Quds day, at the southern town of Nabatiyeh, Lebanon, Aug. 1, 2013. (AP)

As they progress in their training, in the minds of many of these raw recruits, they see themselves in pursuit of the “greater jihad”, and that by sacrificing their lives for Khamenei, they are convinced they will undergo a spiritual transformation that transports them straight to heaven.

One method of indoctrination used to influence these isolated youngsters, are books and magazines extolling the virtues of Khamenei, plus all other aspects of Iranian Shiite doctrine, and once the indoctrinated child reaches seventeen years-old, if the young scout excels in his training, his trainer approaches him with an offer to join the ranks of Hezbollah’s armed resistance group.

As far as Hezbollah is concerned, its president is the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei, who is held in an aura of godliness by the faithful, who look upon him as the delegate of Imam Mahdi, or God’s representative on earth, and as such, they emulate him to the status of being the most divine individual alive, who cannot be equalled among mankind.

With Hezbollah being a dutiful proxy of Iran, the values of Iranian radical Shiite doctrine are brought into play throughout the training of the Imam al-Mahdi recruits, nurturing the child on terrorist culture, whilst glorifying the terror group’s past martyrs, most of whom have died due to their connection to Hezbollah’s terrorist activities.

Revered ‘martyrs’

The most prominent of those revered “martyrs” come in the form of its co-founder and Secretary General Abbas Mussawi, who was assassinated in 1992, and its military commander Imad Mughniya, who was assassinated in 2008, whose faces can be seen across Lebanon’s Shiite areas, staring down from huge posters.

Established in 1985, the Imam al-Mahdi Scouts is believed to have around 50,000 members, who are distributed amongst more than 500 regiments, many of whom will eventually enter Hezbollah’s armed wing, or will go on to become ardent activists of the group. Even the remainder who do not take up a vocation within the organisation, will still have become heavily indoctrinated as to radical Shiite ideology, passing it on to family and friends.

The main topic on the curriculum of the al-Mahdi scouts has always been the destruction of Israel, they are also taught that becoming a martyr to protect their land is the highest of virtues, and during these intensive summer courses, scouts are also taught weapons skills, and take part in target practice. But there is also a lighter side to lessons, where youngsters are taught to read and write, they are also taught computer skills, and lessons in administration.

%d bloggers like this: