Muslim Brotherhood in America, Part 10: What’s To Be Done?

How to defeat the most serious and imminent of such dangers in our time: the Islamist doctrine of sharia and the efforts of its adherents to impose it world-wide, on Muslims and non-Muslims alike, through violent means or by stealth.

#Islam: Everybody Mock #Mohammed. Everyday. In Every Way Possible

EXACTLY. Until they remove all the bs video they put out on the Jews and those pesky infidels messing with their peaceful ways…

It’s the least we can do. Because only people who prefer to mate with their first cousins could actually consider Islam a religion. (See quran passages below)

BNI //

H/T Answering Muslims

Qur’an 8:12 – Your Lord inspired the angels with the message: I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes. So wound their bodies and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and His Apostle.

Qur’an 8:59 – The infidels should not think that they can get away from us. Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may terrorize them.

Qur’an 4:15 – If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, take the evidence of four witnesses from amongst you against them; if they testify, confine them to houses until death [by starvation] claims them.

Qur’an 24:6 – And for those who launch a charge against their wives, accusing them, but have no witnesses or evidence, except themselves; let the testimony of one of them be four testimonies, (swearing four times) by Allah that he is the one speaking the truth.

Qur’an 9:29—Fight those who believe not in Allah.

Qur’an 9:5 – When the sacred forbidden months for fighting are past, fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, torture them, and lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.

Qur’an 33:26 – Allah made the Jews leave their homes by terrorizing them so that you killed some and made many captive. And He made you inherit their lands, their homes, and their wealth. He gave you a country you had not traversed before.

Qur’an 98:6—Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islam, the Qur’an and Prophet Muhammad) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikun will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.

Qur’an 5:51—O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.

Qur’an 5:37 – The [Christian] disbelievers will long to get out of the Fire, but never will they get out there from; and theirs will be an enduring torture.

Qur’an 59:2 – It was Allah who drove the [Jewish] People of the Book from their homes and into exile. They refused to believe and Allah came at them from where they did not suspect, and filled their hearts with terror. Their homes were destroyed.

Qur’an 2:190 – Jihad is holy fighting in Allah’s Cause with full force of numbers and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars. By Jihad Islam is established, Allah’s Word is made superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and Islam is propagated. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, or does not fulfill this duty, dies as a hypocrite.

Qur’an 59:14 – The Jews are devoid of sense. There is a grievous punishment awaiting them. Satan tells them not to believe so they will end up in Hell.

Qur’an 88:1 – A tormented doom awaits the Jews.  Some faces (all disbelievers, Jews and Christians) that Day, will be humiliated, downcast, scorched by the burning fire, while they are made to drink from a boiling hot spring.

Qur’an 5:35 – As for the disbelievers [previously defined as Christians], if they had everything on earth, two times over, to give as ransom for the penalty of the Day of Doom, it would never be accepted from them. Theirs will be a painful torment. They will desire to get out of the fire, but they shall not be released from it. They shall have an everlasting torture.

Qur’an 5:73 – They are surely disbelievers who blaspheme and say: ‘God is one of three in the Trinity for there is no Ilah (God) except One, Allah. If they desist not from saying this (blasphemy), verily a grievous penalty will befall them – the disbelievers will suffer a painful doom.

Qur’an 33:64 – Verily Allah has cursed the Unbelievers [whom he defines as Christians in the 5th surah] and has prepared for them a Blazing Fire to dwell in forever.


#Obama apologetic about boycotting #Ahmadinejad #UN speech

As expected, the U.S. delegation boycotted Iranian President Ahmadinejad’s speech at the UN General Assembly in New York.  But the reason given by the Obama administration for this gesture is, to say the least, perplexing.   Here’s the official explanation, as related by Erin Pelton, the spokeswoman for the U.N. mission to the United Nations:

 “Over the last couple of days, we’ve seen Mr. Ahmadinejad once again use his trip to the U.N. not to address the legitimate aspirations of the Iranian people but to instead spout paranoid theories and repulsive slurs against Israel.”

So far so good.  But not so good when Pelton gets around to why the American delegation wasn’t in the hall when Ahmadinejad went through his tirades.  Here’s how she put it:

“It’s particularly unfortunate that Mr. Ahmadinejad will have the platform of the UNGA on Yom Kippur, which is why the United States decided not to attend.”

I had to read that sentence several times to get its full significance.  And then it hit me.  It turns out that the reason for the U.S. boycott wasn’t due to Ahmadinejad’s lengthy history of genocidal threats to eliminate the Jewish state, which one might assume prompted other diplomats, including the Canadian and Israeli delegations, to boycott his speech.

No, the Americans kept away not because of Ahmadinejad’s repulsive record, but because the Obama administration didn’t want to offend Jews on Yom Kippur, Judaism’s holiest date.  But this in turn suggests that it might not have boycotted the Iranian leader if he spoke at the U.N. on any other day.   Say, the day before or the day after Yom Kippur.   And this is more than a mere supposition about some presumably innocent slip.    Team  Obama is well known for its reverence of the U.N. and its determination to “engage” in  diplomacy some of the world’s worst tyrants, usually getting nothing in return.  Given this predilection, it’s not really a great surprise that only Yom Kippur stood in the way of the administration turning its back on Ahmadinejad.  On any other day, it could or would have been different.

Or in other words, plain and simple, it wasn’t Ahmadinejad who prompted the U.S. boycott —  it was the Jews.   The boycott came with an apology to Tehran on Yom Kippur – the day of Repentance.  How fitting.

Leo Rennert is a former White House correspondent and Washington bureau chief of McClatchy Newspapers
Read more:

#Israel:#PA hate-video returns on PA TV

In PA TV music video, Israel is:
“My enemy, oh my enemy”
“Treacherous” “Oh imperialism”
“Oh snake, you are coiled around the land”
“You have no choice, oh enemy, but to leave my country”
by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik
A music video that defines Israel as the “enemy,” “treacherous,” and a “snake” was broadcast on official Palestinian Authority television twice recently.
The song refers to Israel as an “enemy” six times and compares Israel to a “snake” that is “coiled around the land.” It also refers to Israel as a “treaty breaker” and accuses Israel of “imperialism.” The last two verses of the song anticipate the day Palestinians will defeat Israel in battle, ending with the line, “You have no choice, oh enemy, but to leave my country.”

Click to view

Palestinian Media Watch reported on this PA TV hate speech when the song was being broadcast regularly from 2007-2009. After not appearing on PA TV for two years, it is now being rebroadcast.

PMW has documented the ongoing PA policy of demonizing Israel and denying Israel’s right to exist. These PA messages are frequently expressed through cultural media like song and dance. Earlier this year, PMW reported on a Palestinian art piece shown on PA TV that depicted Israel as a monster impaling Palestinian babies and eating them.

The following is the transcript of the PA TV music video:

“My enemy, oh my enemy, stop your crimes.
Treaty breaker! Treacherous!
If you pull out my eyes, my heart will see.
If you cut off my hands, my chest is knives and swords.
My enemy, oh imperialism, this homeland is ours.
This land will be tilled only by our hoes.
My enemy, oh my enemy, stop your crimes.
My enemy, oh snake, you are coiled around the land.
We, noble and courageous, on the day of battle shall stand.
You have no choice, oh enemy, but to leave my country.”
[PA TV (Fatah), repeatedly Oct. 2007- Feb. 2010, June 2010,

and most recent broadcasts on Aug. 23 and Sept. 6, 2012

#Iran: Woman Exercises Her Rights and Lefts Against Iran’s Veiling Law

Lol,Good for her to stand up to these backward f*cks from the thought police..

by /A woman in the Iranian city of Shamirzad, angered earlier this month by a cleric who told her she was insufficiently covered, decided that enough was enough with such religious street harassment and took matters into her own hands. Or rather her fists and feet, to be more exact.

Women in Iran are required to be covered up in public in accordance with a law introduced after the 1979 Iranian Revolution, causing most never to leave home without first wrapping themselves up in a body-encompassing black hijab. Women appearing in public deemed improperly covered are warned, and sometimes even beaten, by an assortment of morality guardians that include a morality police, regular police, busybody clerics or general, run-of-the mill religious fanatics.

But this apparently fed-up Iranian female was obviously not in the mood for any more religious street bullying, at least on this particular day. After the admonishment about the state of her dress, she abruptly told the intrusive cleric, Hojetoeslam Ali Beheshti: “You should close your eyes.”

“Not only didn’t she cover herself up, but she started shouting and threatening me,” said Beheshti after the brush off.

Beheshti should have taken the woman’s hard-line refusal and behavior as a warning sign. But his supposedly divinely-ordered duty to keep the streets of the mullah state safe for Iranian men who might lose all sexual self-control at the sight of a bare, well-turned ankle and other such horrendous, woman-derived, society-threatening evil appears to have overridden all common sense and he unwisely repeated his admonishment. Bad mistake.

“She pushed me and I fell to the ground on my back,” Beheshti related. “From that point on, I don’t know what happened. I was just feeling the kicks of the woman who was beating me up and insulting me.”

The price of the poor cleric’s martyrdom for the cause of “commanding right and forbidding wrong,” as his moral guardian duties are officially called, was a three-day stay in the hospital.

Golnaz Esfandiari, a correspondent for Radio Free Europe, wrote about the incident on her blog, saying the story appeared in the semi-official Iranian news agency, Mehr. An Iranian woman herself, Esfandiari says she does not support violence but has an understanding of the cleric-beating woman’s actions.

“[A]s a woman who grew up in Iran and was harassed many times for appearing in public in a way that was deemed un-Islamic, I understand the frustration that that woman in Semnan (Province) must have felt and why she lashed out at the cleric,” Esfandiari wrote. “For the past 30 years, Iranian women have been harassed by the morality police, security forces, and zealots over their appearance[.]”

Esfandiari adds in her blog that mandatory, and forcible, wearing of the hijab is the main reason young women want to leave Iran. She states that for many of them, “the hijab feels like a burden, an insult, a limitation of their freedom and attempt to keep them under control.” Rather than being a “protection” for society, as the official line goes, many feel it is simply “an insult.” And then there is the problem of the virtue police and their dehumanizing behavior towards women.

“Women being mistreated by the police because of their hijabs have become a common scene on the streets of the Iranian capital and other cities, especially during the hot summer months when the hijab crackdown intensifies,” Esfandiari states.

In an interview with the German newspaper Die Welt, Esfandiari said women in Iran now argue frequently with the morality police when they are told that they are insufficiently covered or are “bad hijab,” as the offenders are called.

“Many women, especially north of Tehran, would protest against the strict clothing laws while wearing small, colourful shawls, very tight jeans and make-up too,” said Esfandiari who, the German newspaper says, now lives in Washington and cannot return to Iran because of her work as a journalist.

The physical assault against the cleric in Shamirzad was not the only one reported by Mehr. The news agency revealed that clerics had been attacked in at least three other instances, including one against “a representative of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khomeini.” The news agency does not say whether the clerics’ assailants were women, but does state “they have all been beaten up for performing their religious duty of [commanding right and forbidding wrong] and in some cases sustained irreparable damage.”

In her Die Welt interview, Esfandiari says she is unable to account for the increase in assaults on clerics or whether they represent a trend. What surprises her most, however, is not the fact that there has been more than one attack on clerics but rather that the attacks are being reported at all and by a semi-official news agency at that.

“Normally,” Esfandiari recounted, “one learns about such incidents not in the state media; one hears about them by word of mouth.”

Despite saying he had experienced “the worst days of his life,” Beheshti wants to drop the matter. The police, however, think differently and are investigating. The prosecutor calls the case “a public beating,” which it most certainly was. But Esfandiari points out with clarity the hypocrisy of the state’s position:

“Of course when the same type of incident is reversed – a ‘badly veiled’ woman being beaten in public by police – it’s simply a necessary enforcement of the dress code.”

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.


#Egypt : Muslim Brotherhood President Frees Monster in Brutal Luxor Massacre

by //

President Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood’s Monster-in-Charge of Egypt, has announced the pardon of Mostafa Hamza, a leader of The Islamic Group.

Al-Jamaa Al-Islamiya leader Mostafa Hamza, detained for terrorist activity and attempt on Hosni Mubarak’s life, released Tuesday by President Morsi’s pardon. Hamza, a leading member of Islamic organisation Al-Jamaa Al-Islamiya, was extradited to Egypt from Iran in 2004. He was detained following terrorism-related charges that included being a member of Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan.

Forget Mubarak, Hamza was responsible for a lot of atrocities, but his ugliest hour may have been the Luxor Massacre.

Six black-garbed gunmen killed two police officers and shot unarmed ticket-takers Monday while taking over the temple compound.

They then took their time–”dancing and singing” for an hour, one survivor said–as they slaughtered and mutilated helpless visitors from Switzerland, Japan, Germany, Britain and several other countries.

Police said Thursday that a note found in the wallet of one of the attackers said the operation had been ordered by an Islamic Group leader, Mustafa Hamza, who is believed to be in hiding in Afghanistan.

The Luxor Massacre has been mostly forgotten, but it deserves to be remembered as a template of the Islamist soul. The full horror of what happened there needs to be understood for us to understand what Morsi has just done.

As they ran past a Japanese tourist, she said, one of the men fired into the woman’s face from a range of about 15 inches.

“They made us get down on our knees,” Ms Dousse said. “And then they started shooting. A man who was very heavy fell on me and the lady behind me also covered me … They shot me in the arm and leg, and then they started again shooting those who were still alive in the head.

The gunmen “took all the young women, the girls, and disappeared with them. I don’t know where they went with the women, but they hurt them. We could hear screams of pain,” Dousse said.

“It went on for a long time, an hour or an hour and a half. The terrorists came back again and again; they danced and sang,” she said.

Among the horrors, the marauders cut off the ears and noses of several of their victims. A note praising Islam was found inside one disemboweled body.

The foreign dead included 31 Swiss, 10 Japanese, five Germans, four Britons one a child a Bulgarian, a Colombian and a French citizen. The Japanese victims were four newlywed couples and an elderly couple on their second honeymoon.

A statement issued in the name of Egypt’s most prominent Islamic militant group said that the massacre had begun as an effort to take hostages in order to secure the release of a leader imprisoned in New York for his role in the World Trade Center bombing. But the accounts by survivors gave no hint of any attempts to take tourists alive – only to kill and, perhaps, to butcher, them.

The terrorists came back, as they sang, danced and shouted “Allah, Allah …”. It took an eternity before help arrived.

Two British backpackers told last night how a screaming terrorist slit the throat of a tourist as he begged for mercy.  Stuart Bentley and Paula Wainwright watched terrified from behind a pillar as the black-clad gunman first riddled the man’s legs with bullets as he tried to flee.

Stuart said: “I saw three men dressed in black.They were screaming something, almost like a chant, and shooting indiscriminately.

“I saw one man, who looked European, trying to run away. He was shot in the legs, rolled over and clasped his hands together as if begging for his life. But the gunman just cut his throat and began firing again.”

The remains of the Luxor massacre victim Joan Turner were eventually flown back to Britain yesterday. The body of her daughter, Karina, is still missing.

Behind the difficulties in identifying the bodies of the family lies the brutal fact that their Muslim fundamentalist killers had deliberately disfigured the bodies of their victims after stripping them. They had been shot in the face after they were dead.

After the September 11, 2012 attacks, Morsi pardoned one of the worst monsters in the ranks of Egyptian Salafists, the man who ordered this atrocity. This is not an accident, this is a message. It is a statement from the Muslim Brotherhood that Obama has put in charge of Egypt. “I am with you.”

Whatever outrage there was over the freeing of the Lockerbie bomber should be doubled and trebled in this case. The Luxor Massacre was far more horrifying than Lockerbie. It was closer to Beslan and Morsi has made it clear that his new Egypt is on the side of the perpetrators of the Luxor Massacre.